<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The All New Mac Pro: Sleeker, Sexier and More Refined</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:14:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uhh</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>uhh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>render actually sucks. How could the person actually mess up the comparative sizes of the ports from the front and back pictures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>render actually sucks. How could the person actually mess up the comparative sizes of the ports from the front and back pictures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AttK</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3307</link>
		<dc:creator>AttK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3307</guid>
		<description>You DO realize FW800 is backward-compatible, right?  All you need is an adapter or a FW400 to FW800 cable... Also, with a adapter, you&#039;ve got your 2 DVI ports...  and the eject button is on the KEYBOARD and works just fine!  And you actually own a mac pro?  Whoa... scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You DO realize FW800 is backward-compatible, right?  All you need is an adapter or a FW400 to FW800 cable&#8230; Also, with a adapter, you&#8217;ve got your 2 DVI ports&#8230;  and the eject button is on the KEYBOARD and works just fine!  And you actually own a mac pro?  Whoa&#8230; scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scoox</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>The new Mac Pro is worse than the old one. It may have a better CPU etc but... no Firewire 400, 4 useless Firewire 800 ports when there are more Firewire 400 than 800 devices in use and on the market, no dual DVI graphics card, still no eject button on the DVD drive. A piece of pretty junk basically. I own the previous model and anyway I am going to sell on eBay next week because it is a pain to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Mac Pro is worse than the old one. It may have a better CPU etc but&#8230; no Firewire 400, 4 useless Firewire 800 ports when there are more Firewire 400 than 800 devices in use and on the market, no dual DVI graphics card, still no eject button on the DVD drive. A piece of pretty junk basically. I own the previous model and anyway I am going to sell on eBay next week because it is a pain to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>Yeah should have known apple wouldn&#039;t do even a third of these even though were asking for it and every other manufacturer employs some of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah should have known apple wouldn&#8217;t do even a third of these even though were asking for it and every other manufacturer employs some of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3220</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3220</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what you own now but on the HF11 you need a dual processor in order to log and transfer any data into final cut Your not really working with that large of content so a mac pro is not really needed. You could just get a macbook pro and save some cash. But, if you have cash to burn then it&#039;s well worth it, make sure you get two screens or you loose half the fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what you own now but on the HF11 you need a dual processor in order to log and transfer any data into final cut Your not really working with that large of content so a mac pro is not really needed. You could just get a macbook pro and save some cash. But, if you have cash to burn then it&#8217;s well worth it, make sure you get two screens or you loose half the fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frazier</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>Frazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>Question for you experts.  I am acquiring a canon HF11 high definition camcorder AND a digital SLR camera.  I am going to be doing some intermediate HD video and photo editing for home use.  I&#039;ve always been a PC guy and I&#039;m ready to make the switch.  My question is this, is a MAC Pro going to be too much for me?  Thanks for your assistance and advice. 

Respectfully

Frazier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question for you experts.  I am acquiring a canon HF11 high definition camcorder AND a digital SLR camera.  I am going to be doing some intermediate HD video and photo editing for home use.  I&#8217;ve always been a PC guy and I&#8217;m ready to make the switch.  My question is this, is a MAC Pro going to be too much for me?  Thanks for your assistance and advice. </p>
<p>Respectfully</p>
<p>Frazier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3114</guid>
		<description>But When ?   !!!

I really need a new macPro...
Anyone an idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But When ?   !!!</p>
<p>I really need a new macPro&#8230;<br />
Anyone an idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discussed</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>discussed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>only slot-loading drives on a professional machine? I hope not. I work with a lot of people who capture video on mini-dvd camcorders, and they better not take my easy-to-use tray away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only slot-loading drives on a professional machine? I hope not. I work with a lot of people who capture video on mini-dvd camcorders, and they better not take my easy-to-use tray away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3095</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3095</guid>
		<description>Nice render work, but I seriously do not hope it will look like this... The embossed/rounded front edge is plain ugly and cheap and will absolutely not fit in the new Aluminum/Black glass look. Also the smaller mesh feels bad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice render work, but I seriously do not hope it will look like this&#8230; The embossed/rounded front edge is plain ugly and cheap and will absolutely not fit in the new Aluminum/Black glass look. Also the smaller mesh feels bad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/02/03/the-all-new-mac-pro-sleeker-sexier-and-more-refined/comment-page-1/#comment-3089</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1310#comment-3089</guid>
		<description>Why on earth does anyone want the power cable up at the top of the machine?!?

The rest of the machine looks great, for a concept...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth does anyone want the power cable up at the top of the machine?!?</p>
<p>The rest of the machine looks great, for a concept&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
