<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood&#8217;s Crippling Dependency on Steve Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:00:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jasmine</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>It is true that Hollywood’s always been Steve Jobs’ pet interest…It is quite difficult to Understand Apple’s terms of negotiating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that Hollywood’s always been Steve Jobs’ pet interest…It is quite difficult to Understand Apple’s terms of negotiating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>Aviv, I think you&#039;re missing a crucial element here. Not only does Jobs carry the brand&#039;s name on his shoulders, the mere argument that we&#039;re having, about how demanding he is in negotiations, is what will be lost. He is cut-throat, relentless and as some say &quot;the best entrepreneur in the world,&quot; and I am not sure how anyone could feel comfortable about any part of Apple&#039;s business if Steve were to retire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aviv, I think you&#8217;re missing a crucial element here. Not only does Jobs carry the brand&#8217;s name on his shoulders, the mere argument that we&#8217;re having, about how demanding he is in negotiations, is what will be lost. He is cut-throat, relentless and as some say &#8220;the best entrepreneur in the world,&#8221; and I am not sure how anyone could feel comfortable about any part of Apple&#8217;s business if Steve were to retire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aviv</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessary for anybody to worry about iTunes struggling for content once Steve Jobs is gone. I am baffled sometimes by how much people think every facet of Apple&#039;s company relies on one person, that person being Steve Jobs. Even to the point of managing negotiations with Hollywood/Music Studios. 

Steve Jobs is not at every meeting. The fundamentals are in play. As mentioned above in the comments, it took the studios a &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; long time to convince Apple to do three-tiered pricing with their content. iTunes is a fundamentally strong and sound business model. It flipped the industry on its head, and there&#039;s no way to tie all of its success directly to Steve Jobs.

The notion that iTunes would be less of a product, or less of an influential asset if Steve Jobs isn&#039;t around is just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessary for anybody to worry about iTunes struggling for content once Steve Jobs is gone. I am baffled sometimes by how much people think every facet of Apple&#8217;s company relies on one person, that person being Steve Jobs. Even to the point of managing negotiations with Hollywood/Music Studios. </p>
<p>Steve Jobs is not at every meeting. The fundamentals are in play. As mentioned above in the comments, it took the studios a <i>very</i> long time to convince Apple to do three-tiered pricing with their content. iTunes is a fundamentally strong and sound business model. It flipped the industry on its head, and there&#8217;s no way to tie all of its success directly to Steve Jobs.</p>
<p>The notion that iTunes would be less of a product, or less of an influential asset if Steve Jobs isn&#8217;t around is just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>Really Chase. So you&#039;re trying to say that iTunes is the best thing out there right now? Do you think it would be anywhere without Apple&#039;s relentless push in selling the iPod and iPhone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Chase. So you&#8217;re trying to say that iTunes is the best thing out there right now? Do you think it would be anywhere without Apple&#8217;s relentless push in selling the iPod and iPhone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sno-cone</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>sno-cone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>Why in the fuck does anyone care if Jobs isn&#039;t around to make deals anymore. Apple always gets their way and if not, as the case with the new three-tier pricing, it takes YEARS for anybody to convince Apple to change their minds. By that time music will be beamed into our skulls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why in the fuck does anyone care if Jobs isn&#8217;t around to make deals anymore. Apple always gets their way and if not, as the case with the new three-tier pricing, it takes YEARS for anybody to convince Apple to change their minds. By that time music will be beamed into our skulls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojo22</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>jojo22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>they just want Jobs gone so the deal talks aren&#039;t so harsh. undoubtedly Jobs makes it harder on the music companies. he knows he runs the distribution channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they just want Jobs gone so the deal talks aren&#8217;t so harsh. undoubtedly Jobs makes it harder on the music companies. he knows he runs the distribution channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase Westwick</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3022</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase Westwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3022</guid>
		<description>I dont think that Apple&#039;s negotiations with any major entertainment house will just completely fail because Steve is gone.  iTunes speaks for itself.  *Clout*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think that Apple&#8217;s negotiations with any major entertainment house will just completely fail because Steve is gone.  iTunes speaks for itself.  *Clout*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/30/hollywoods-crippling-dependency-on-steve-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-3021</link>
		<dc:creator>samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1300#comment-3021</guid>
		<description>Jobs changed the world of music and music distribution forever. The other companies probably can&#039;t wait until he&#039;s gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jobs changed the world of music and music distribution forever. The other companies probably can&#8217;t wait until he&#8217;s gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
