<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Launching a $19.99 Premium Game Section in App Store?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/29/apple-launching-a-1999-premium-game-section-in-app-store/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/29/apple-launching-a-1999-premium-game-section-in-app-store/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:38:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/29/apple-launching-a-1999-premium-game-section-in-app-store/comment-page-1/#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1295#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone, I&#039;m a bit late on the chat, it&#039;s not like I was going
any more relevant than anyone else but here is what I think.

I think it&#039;s safe to say that people are slightly narrow minded when
it comes to defining these portable device. Being a &quot;fanboy&quot; or a
&quot;fangirl&quot; is quite a comftarble status unlike simply being rational
about the situation.

First, the iPod Touch and the iPhone are multimedia platform. Often,
the music player is acknowledge has it&#039;s unique feature. The iPod
Touch and iPhone is actually a pretty powerful device (memory, speed
&amp; rendering) that can actually browse the web, run diverse types of
application and support a large array of media files.

These device are now pushing toward  their gaming aspect. The Touch
Gen are unconventional for gaming, they are somewhat less technical
and more intuitive (this is the same reason some may never like the
Wii). Because of their nature, a lot of the game released for Apple
devices are crap and of homebrew quality. It was the same for the DS
when it came out, but Nintendo had more experience in blocking trash
from their platform.

It&#039;s safe to say that the Apple Premium Games will push the gaming
aspect of the Touch Gen even beyond their MVP app&#039;s. They have to.
Why? Well this brings me to my second point.

The DS and PSP which are what people call &quot;gaming dedicated devices&quot;
actually have a lot of multimedia potential. Sony and Nintendo are
slowly but convincingly pushing toward multi-functions devices with
new firmware, hardware and services just like Apple. Everyone is
adventuring in to everyones territory. Thats how capitalism works :P
Apple, Sony and Nintendo actions are not really surprising.

I&#039;ll watch how things work out for these guys. Fanslaves, choose your
camp; technical=PSP, hybrid=DS, intuitive=iPod.  Has for me, I&#039;m
pretty much versatile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone, I&#8217;m a bit late on the chat, it&#8217;s not like I was going<br />
any more relevant than anyone else but here is what I think.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say that people are slightly narrow minded when<br />
it comes to defining these portable device. Being a &#8220;fanboy&#8221; or a<br />
&#8220;fangirl&#8221; is quite a comftarble status unlike simply being rational<br />
about the situation.</p>
<p>First, the iPod Touch and the iPhone are multimedia platform. Often,<br />
the music player is acknowledge has it&#8217;s unique feature. The iPod<br />
Touch and iPhone is actually a pretty powerful device (memory, speed<br />
&amp; rendering) that can actually browse the web, run diverse types of<br />
application and support a large array of media files.</p>
<p>These device are now pushing toward  their gaming aspect. The Touch<br />
Gen are unconventional for gaming, they are somewhat less technical<br />
and more intuitive (this is the same reason some may never like the<br />
Wii). Because of their nature, a lot of the game released for Apple<br />
devices are crap and of homebrew quality. It was the same for the DS<br />
when it came out, but Nintendo had more experience in blocking trash<br />
from their platform.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s safe to say that the Apple Premium Games will push the gaming<br />
aspect of the Touch Gen even beyond their MVP app&#8217;s. They have to.<br />
Why? Well this brings me to my second point.</p>
<p>The DS and PSP which are what people call &#8220;gaming dedicated devices&#8221;<br />
actually have a lot of multimedia potential. Sony and Nintendo are<br />
slowly but convincingly pushing toward multi-functions devices with<br />
new firmware, hardware and services just like Apple. Everyone is<br />
adventuring in to everyones territory. Thats how capitalism works <img src='http://www.macblogz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Apple, Sony and Nintendo actions are not really surprising.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll watch how things work out for these guys. Fanslaves, choose your<br />
camp; technical=PSP, hybrid=DS, intuitive=iPod.  Has for me, I&#8217;m<br />
pretty much versatile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aviv</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/29/apple-launching-a-1999-premium-game-section-in-app-store/comment-page-1/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1295#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>@Dave: Well, there are already applications out there that cost over $20. This would be for expensive and &quot;premium&quot; games... Whatever that means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave: Well, there are already applications out there that cost over $20. This would be for expensive and &#8220;premium&#8221; games&#8230; Whatever that means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/29/apple-launching-a-1999-premium-game-section-in-app-store/comment-page-1/#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1295#comment-3011</guid>
		<description>Why just premium games?  Why not have a Premium Apps section instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why just premium games?  Why not have a Premium Apps section instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
