<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macworld Rumor Aftermath: What We Know Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/07/macworld-rumor-aftermath-what-we-know-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/07/macworld-rumor-aftermath-what-we-know-now/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:38:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: macintosh</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/07/macworld-rumor-aftermath-what-we-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>macintosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1224#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>what about the rumored mac home media server or a new mac pro and a ihone nano or a 64 and possibly 128gb ipod touch i heard about them befor the show and it never happend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the rumored mac home media server or a new mac pro and a ihone nano or a 64 and possibly 128gb ipod touch i heard about them befor the show and it never happend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aviv</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/07/macworld-rumor-aftermath-what-we-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1224#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>@smoke&amp;mirrors: they&#039;ve definitely been proven accurate in the past though. credit where credit is due. Right AI ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@smoke&#038;mirrors: they&#8217;ve definitely been proven accurate in the past though. credit where credit is due. Right AI ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smok and mirrors</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/07/macworld-rumor-aftermath-what-we-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>smok and mirrors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1224#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>9to5 pretty much nailed a lot of what they posted. AI seems like a pile of speculative information. Nothing from original sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9to5 pretty much nailed a lot of what they posted. AI seems like a pile of speculative information. Nothing from original sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nevel</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2009/01/07/macworld-rumor-aftermath-what-we-know-now/comment-page-1/#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>nevel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1224#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>28&quot; iMac? pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff 

not happening</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28&#8243; iMac? pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff </p>
<p>not happening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
