<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T and Apple May Not Be Seeing Eye to Eye With Future Distribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:13:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Techstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-3408</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Techstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-3408</guid>
		<description>I switched from Comcast to U-Verse about 3 months ago and could not be happier, Comcast was over-priced and does not have the features that U-Verse offers.  So far U-Verse&#039;s picture quality is second to none.  As for the iPhone, AT&amp;T will throw whatever it takes at Apple to keep the exclusive rights to the iPhone.  I do have a few dropped calls on mine, but have many, and I mean MANY friends who constantly complain about their providers and some are coming over to AT&amp;T due to the new iPhone and it&#039;s features.  The 3G network is expanding and I have even heard rumors of AT&amp;T possibly upgrading the network in the future for even faster data stream.  As for now, I continue to be a happy iPhone owner.  Can&#039;t wait to go out and get the new 3G S!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched from Comcast to U-Verse about 3 months ago and could not be happier, Comcast was over-priced and does not have the features that U-Verse offers.  So far U-Verse&#8217;s picture quality is second to none.  As for the iPhone, AT&amp;T will throw whatever it takes at Apple to keep the exclusive rights to the iPhone.  I do have a few dropped calls on mine, but have many, and I mean MANY friends who constantly complain about their providers and some are coming over to AT&amp;T due to the new iPhone and it&#8217;s features.  The 3G network is expanding and I have even heard rumors of AT&amp;T possibly upgrading the network in the future for even faster data stream.  As for now, I continue to be a happy iPhone owner.  Can&#8217;t wait to go out and get the new 3G S!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>George Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>I hope they drop ATT... the connection to Apple has gone to their head.  U-Verse is the biggest POS ever.  Comcast is way better and has more content, faster speed and better quality HD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they drop ATT&#8230; the connection to Apple has gone to their head.  U-Verse is the biggest POS ever.  Comcast is way better and has more content, faster speed and better quality HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>to me the smartest move they could pull is to do unlimited data and texting for $30 total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to me the smartest move they could pull is to do unlimited data and texting for $30 total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Apple iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Apple iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>Hmm that&#039;s interesting. I wondering what will come of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm that&#8217;s interesting. I wondering what will come of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laird Popkin</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2293</link>
		<dc:creator>Laird Popkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2293</guid>
		<description>While it&#039;s true that Apple uses many of the same components as in PC&#039;s (RAM, hard drives, etc.), you get some other things wrong.

- Apple does make their own hardware and OS, allowing them to integrate them together to work smoothly. This is in contrast to the PC world where there is immense variation, which can be great, but which leads to unpredictable interactions that lead to lots of time spent debugging. So while it&#039;s true that Apple doesn&#039;t make their own components, they do make complete systems that work together well, and are well supported by the OS. Yes, you can build your own computer, and hack Mac OS X onto it, but that&#039;s clearly not supported by Apple, so while it&#039;s fun, it&#039;s not a reasonable option for most users.

- Mac&#039;s do have better components. Apple&#039;s build quality is very high, and they use better quality components than  the bargain PC brands. This is one of the reasons that Apple has an extremely good repair history. For example, see http://www.consumersearch.com/apple-laptops/macintosh-reliability: &quot;According to the largest consumer surveys, Apple laptops are the most reliable and have the highest level of satisfaction. Results are similar for desktops in large surveys&quot;. Sometimes it&#039;s a matter of selecting higher grade components (e.g. RAM, power supplies), sometimes it&#039;s a matter of custom hardware (e.g. the CPU in the MacBook Air), sometimes custom firmware, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s true that Apple uses many of the same components as in PC&#8217;s (RAM, hard drives, etc.), you get some other things wrong.</p>
<p>- Apple does make their own hardware and OS, allowing them to integrate them together to work smoothly. This is in contrast to the PC world where there is immense variation, which can be great, but which leads to unpredictable interactions that lead to lots of time spent debugging. So while it&#8217;s true that Apple doesn&#8217;t make their own components, they do make complete systems that work together well, and are well supported by the OS. Yes, you can build your own computer, and hack Mac OS X onto it, but that&#8217;s clearly not supported by Apple, so while it&#8217;s fun, it&#8217;s not a reasonable option for most users.</p>
<p>- Mac&#8217;s do have better components. Apple&#8217;s build quality is very high, and they use better quality components than  the bargain PC brands. This is one of the reasons that Apple has an extremely good repair history. For example, see <a href="http://www.consumersearch.com/apple-laptops/macintosh-reliability" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.consumersearch.com/apple-laptops/macintosh-reliability?referer=');">http://www.consumersearch.com/apple-laptops/macintosh-reliability</a>: &#8220;According to the largest consumer surveys, Apple laptops are the most reliable and have the highest level of satisfaction. Results are similar for desktops in large surveys&#8221;. Sometimes it&#8217;s a matter of selecting higher grade components (e.g. RAM, power supplies), sometimes it&#8217;s a matter of custom hardware (e.g. the CPU in the MacBook Air), sometimes custom firmware, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree. I have no problem buying an iPhone -- it&#039;s the service plan that&#039;s the sticking point. I currently pay $59 for two phones on Sprint. I can&#039;t justify paying $80+ for something I don&#039;t need. Granted, I want one, but it&#039;s hard to justify when I am in front of a Mac at home or work 75% of the time. In fact, I was more willing to &quot;upgrade&quot; prior to AT&amp;T&#039;s 3G increased pricing.

But, I&#039;m the same way with any service contract. I have lifetime Sirius and Tivo subscriptions because I deplore being fleeced on monthly fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree. I have no problem buying an iPhone &#8212; it&#8217;s the service plan that&#8217;s the sticking point. I currently pay $59 for two phones on Sprint. I can&#8217;t justify paying $80+ for something I don&#8217;t need. Granted, I want one, but it&#8217;s hard to justify when I am in front of a Mac at home or work 75% of the time. In fact, I was more willing to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; prior to AT&amp;T&#8217;s 3G increased pricing.</p>
<p>But, I&#8217;m the same way with any service contract. I have lifetime Sirius and Tivo subscriptions because I deplore being fleeced on monthly fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>&quot;They use specific hardware for their computers, but it’s the exact same hardware you can find on a PC. &quot;

This is, of course, incorrect. First, some items are unique to Apple - the case and motherboard, for example. You can&#039;t buy another PC with Apple&#039;s motherboard. This is one of the key components which affects reliability, so it&#039;s important.

Second, even for &#039;7200 rpm HD&#039;, it&#039;s silly to assume that all 7200 rpm hard drives are equal. There are different specs and different quality levels and Apple chooses a higher quality level than your bargain basement PC.

If Apple hardware is identical to PC hardware, how do you explain the fact that every single survey I&#039;ve ever seen (including multiple surveys from PC Magazine, so you can&#039;t argue bias) shows that Macs have significantly higher reliability than any other PC vendor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They use specific hardware for their computers, but it’s the exact same hardware you can find on a PC. &#8221;</p>
<p>This is, of course, incorrect. First, some items are unique to Apple &#8211; the case and motherboard, for example. You can&#8217;t buy another PC with Apple&#8217;s motherboard. This is one of the key components which affects reliability, so it&#8217;s important.</p>
<p>Second, even for &#8216;7200 rpm HD&#8217;, it&#8217;s silly to assume that all 7200 rpm hard drives are equal. There are different specs and different quality levels and Apple chooses a higher quality level than your bargain basement PC.</p>
<p>If Apple hardware is identical to PC hardware, how do you explain the fact that every single survey I&#8217;ve ever seen (including multiple surveys from PC Magazine, so you can&#8217;t argue bias) shows that Macs have significantly higher reliability than any other PC vendor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech010101x</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech010101x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>secretmrx wrote, &quot;Macs do not have “better components”.&quot; That is not strictly true. Almost every manufacturer bins the output of their production - some parts are the highest grade and quality while others coming off the same line with the same model # are not as good. For example, the hard drives in Apple Drive Modules or Vtrak 750GB drive modules are guaranteed to have zero defects - unlike the drives sold at retail stores. Apple might not be very different from other Tier 1 vendors, but it would be a mistake to think that there is not a big difference between a Tier 1 vendor that strives for a good balance of cost and quality versus your local garage PC assembler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>secretmrx wrote, &#8220;Macs do not have “better components”.&#8221; That is not strictly true. Almost every manufacturer bins the output of their production &#8211; some parts are the highest grade and quality while others coming off the same line with the same model # are not as good. For example, the hard drives in Apple Drive Modules or Vtrak 750GB drive modules are guaranteed to have zero defects &#8211; unlike the drives sold at retail stores. Apple might not be very different from other Tier 1 vendors, but it would be a mistake to think that there is not a big difference between a Tier 1 vendor that strives for a good balance of cost and quality versus your local garage PC assembler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>@ secretmrx:

I have no idea where you got this information, as it is incorrect. They use specific hardware for their computers, but it&#039;s the exact same hardware you can find on a PC. An Intel Core2Duo processor is the same on a Mac as it is on a PC, just as is a 7200RPM HD. None of the parts in an Apple computer are made by Apple - they are bought OEM from other companies just like virtually every computer manufacturer does.

I&#039;m guessing that you&#039;re confusing that with the fact that OS X&#039;s native driver support only extends to their own hardware. This is for good reason, since the only PCs they want running OS X are ones that are sold by Apple themselves. It would be a waste of their developers&#039; times to create drivers for hardware they don&#039;t intend on ever being in a Mac in the first place. However, it&#039;s fully possible to run OS X on a PC by adding custom-made drivers for your hardware, just like it&#039;s fully possible to run XP/Vista on a Mac since it already has native driver support for all the components in it.

Macs do not have &quot;better components&quot;. In fact, various tests have shown that while Apple users typically report better customer support than the average PC user, the failure rate of Apple laptops is higher than the average one from a manufacturer.

Apple products being absolutely superior to PCs is simply a myth - if you like manufactured computers/laptops and prefer Apple products then by all means buy one, but many tests have shown they don&#039;t have anything vastly superior. Personally, I recommend just building your own PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ secretmrx:</p>
<p>I have no idea where you got this information, as it is incorrect. They use specific hardware for their computers, but it&#8217;s the exact same hardware you can find on a PC. An Intel Core2Duo processor is the same on a Mac as it is on a PC, just as is a 7200RPM HD. None of the parts in an Apple computer are made by Apple &#8211; they are bought OEM from other companies just like virtually every computer manufacturer does.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that you&#8217;re confusing that with the fact that OS X&#8217;s native driver support only extends to their own hardware. This is for good reason, since the only PCs they want running OS X are ones that are sold by Apple themselves. It would be a waste of their developers&#8217; times to create drivers for hardware they don&#8217;t intend on ever being in a Mac in the first place. However, it&#8217;s fully possible to run OS X on a PC by adding custom-made drivers for your hardware, just like it&#8217;s fully possible to run XP/Vista on a Mac since it already has native driver support for all the components in it.</p>
<p>Macs do not have &#8220;better components&#8221;. In fact, various tests have shown that while Apple users typically report better customer support than the average PC user, the failure rate of Apple laptops is higher than the average one from a manufacturer.</p>
<p>Apple products being absolutely superior to PCs is simply a myth &#8211; if you like manufactured computers/laptops and prefer Apple products then by all means buy one, but many tests have shown they don&#8217;t have anything vastly superior. Personally, I recommend just building your own PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAMES wHITE</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/12/14/att-and-apple-may-not-be-seeing-eye-to-eye-with-future-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator>JAMES wHITE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1152#comment-2276</guid>
		<description>All I know is IPhone rocks! wIOULD HAVE WENT ANYWHERE i HAD TO TO GET MY 3g.

www.privacy-center.be.tc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I know is IPhone rocks! wIOULD HAVE WENT ANYWHERE i HAD TO TO GET MY 3g.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.privacy-center.be.tc" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.privacy-center.be.tc?referer=');">http://www.privacy-center.be.tc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
