Comments on: Judge Dismisses Two of Three Claims Made in iPhone 3G Lawsuit [U] http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/21/judge-dismisses-two-of-three-claims-made-in-iphone-3g-lawsuit/ Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill. Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:38:10 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Aviv http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/21/judge-dismisses-two-of-three-claims-made-in-iphone-3g-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1646 Aviv Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:33:52 +0000 http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1057#comment-1646 Unfortunately, this country has a legal system set in place that allows people to exploit loopholes to get rich. It doesn't matter if what they say or do is completely unethical (by mass standards), they still do it, and in the off chance that it works... they will have worked the system and cheated their way into money. Apple is constantly in the spotlight, and they think that maybe, just maybe their lawsuit will be the one that wins. Unfortunately, this country has a legal system set in place that allows people to exploit loopholes to get rich. It doesn’t matter if what they say or do is completely unethical (by mass standards), they still do it, and in the off chance that it works… they will have worked the system and cheated their way into money. Apple is constantly in the spotlight, and they think that maybe, just maybe their lawsuit will be the one that wins.

]]> By: pattyCake http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/21/judge-dismisses-two-of-three-claims-made-in-iphone-3g-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1644 pattyCake Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:29:07 +0000 http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1057#comment-1644 These people are pathetic. they just try and make anything a class action lawsuit. I mean, really? why sue Apple? These people are pathetic. they just try and make anything a class action lawsuit. I mean, really? why sue Apple?

]]> By: Aviv http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/21/judge-dismisses-two-of-three-claims-made-in-iphone-3g-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1643 Aviv Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:27:52 +0000 http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1057#comment-1643 You're right Lucas, the 3G cell network issues are not Apple's fault at all. And it certainly feels like Apple is in a way being clumped together with AT&T's brand, and AT&T is absolutely loving it. see here: http://tinyurl.com/6lgksx I also agree with you about Apple's willingness to swap out phones. At the most, you have to suffer through a 10 or 15 minutes "genius" meeting, but after that, they've been very understanding in replacing faulty hardware. The people that jump on the bandwagon, which has already reach capacity twice over, and sue Apple for "hairline cracks" are all part of the same breed that is trying to exploit Apple for anything they can get, through the law. While lowbrow, it spins a negative light on Apple and they are forced to respond. The legal system in this country isn't the greatest, but luckily Cupertino has a good team of "law-stylists" working for them. You’re right Lucas, the 3G cell network issues are not Apple’s fault at all. And it certainly feels like Apple is in a way being clumped together with AT&T’s brand, and AT&T is absolutely loving it. see here: http://tinyurl.com/6lgksx

I also agree with you about Apple’s willingness to swap out phones. At the most, you have to suffer through a 10 or 15 minutes “genius” meeting, but after that, they’ve been very understanding in replacing faulty hardware.

The people that jump on the bandwagon, which has already reach capacity twice over, and sue Apple for “hairline cracks” are all part of the same breed that is trying to exploit Apple for anything they can get, through the law. While lowbrow, it spins a negative light on Apple and they are forced to respond.

The legal system in this country isn’t the greatest, but luckily Cupertino has a good team of “law-stylists” working for them.

]]> By: lucas http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/21/judge-dismisses-two-of-three-claims-made-in-iphone-3g-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1642 lucas Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:22:38 +0000 http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1057#comment-1642 okay here's my view on all of this. 1. the lack of 3g coverage in an area is NOT the fault of Apple. that is on ATT. Apple should not be party to any lawsuits on that issue. 2. I am shocked that anyone would claim they were not serviced on a faulty phone. I walked in with a possibly faulty phone (might have been the phone, might have been an app I downloaded) and my local store swapped my phone 'just in case it's the phone' without flinching. unless they see signs of drop/water/etc damage they seemed to be just swapping phones for most problems okay here’s my view on all of this. 1. the lack of 3g coverage in an area is NOT the fault of Apple. that is on ATT. Apple should not be party to any lawsuits on that issue.
2. I am shocked that anyone would claim they were not serviced on a faulty phone. I walked in with a possibly faulty phone (might have been the phone, might have been an app I downloaded) and my local store swapped my phone ‘just in case it’s the phone’ without flinching. unless they see signs of drop/water/etc damage they seemed to be just swapping phones for most problems

]]>