<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Leaks Point to Mac Pro Updates Early Next Year?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:14:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1010#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>4 more days to go.... We all hope that the Mac Pro will be updated with a new dual socket mother board hosting the new Intel processor. My feeling tells me that it will be announced at MWSF 09 but will only be available later in Feb. or March/april... Here is an interesting link: http://silveradosys.blogspot.com/2008/12/mwsf-2009-predictionsthe-new-mac-pro.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 more days to go&#8230;. We all hope that the Mac Pro will be updated with a new dual socket mother board hosting the new Intel processor. My feeling tells me that it will be announced at MWSF 09 but will only be available later in Feb. or March/april&#8230; Here is an interesting link: <a href="http://silveradosys.blogspot.com/2008/12/mwsf-2009-predictionsthe-new-mac-pro.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/silveradosys.blogspot.com/2008/12/mwsf-2009-predictionsthe-new-mac-pro.html?referer=');">http://silveradosys.blogspot.com/2008/12/mwsf-2009-predictionsthe-new-mac-pro.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill D.</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1010#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>Count me as another person waiting to see what is introduced at Macworld. I do a lot of video editing and encoding. I would love to see a Mac Pro using 8 cores with hyper-threading on each core for the same price or less as the current line. Running 16 simultaneous threads would speed up video encoding a lot. On the other hand, if the price goes up or the performance goes down, I&#039;ll be quickly searching for a leftover 2008 Mac Pro. I need the machine yesterday, so I&#039;m anxiously counting the days until Macworld.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me as another person waiting to see what is introduced at Macworld. I do a lot of video editing and encoding. I would love to see a Mac Pro using 8 cores with hyper-threading on each core for the same price or less as the current line. Running 16 simultaneous threads would speed up video encoding a lot. On the other hand, if the price goes up or the performance goes down, I&#8217;ll be quickly searching for a leftover 2008 Mac Pro. I need the machine yesterday, so I&#8217;m anxiously counting the days until Macworld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ender</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>Ender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1010#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>Yes, I came across funds to update my 4 year old G5 but I&#039;m going to wait, as well. If I bought now, I know I&#039;d be kicking myself the beginning of next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I came across funds to update my 4 year old G5 but I&#8217;m going to wait, as well. If I bought now, I know I&#8217;d be kicking myself the beginning of next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aviv</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1010#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>Very true LovelyQ... So very true. Not everyone can shell out the premium bucks for a tower that can grow and expand with them over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true LovelyQ&#8230; So very true. Not everyone can shell out the premium bucks for a tower that can grow and expand with them over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LovelyQ</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>LovelyQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1010#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>I just hope this doesn&#039;t keep them so astronomically expensive. Apple should at the same time be working towards lowering the price. A big hurdle for many people to get over with the Mac Pro is the price-tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope this doesn&#8217;t keep them so astronomically expensive. Apple should at the same time be working towards lowering the price. A big hurdle for many people to get over with the Mac Pro is the price-tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnL</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>johnL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1010#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not the only one Foa. I have been secretly praying for an update soon. You could always check out the special deals site:

here ya go, http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not the only one Foa. I have been secretly praying for an update soon. You could always check out the special deals site:</p>
<p>here ya go, <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals?referer=');">http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foa</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/11/13/intel-leaks-point-to-mac-pro-updates-early-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Foa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=1010#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been on the fence about purchasing a lower end Mac pro, but I&#039;m not sure whether I can make the plunge or not. I think we&#039;re going to see a rumor about every possible device being released at Macworld. So, saying &quot;I&#039;ll wait until Macworld&quot; is kind of like.... useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on the fence about purchasing a lower end Mac pro, but I&#8217;m not sure whether I can make the plunge or not. I think we&#8217;re going to see a rumor about every possible device being released at Macworld. So, saying &#8220;I&#8217;ll wait until Macworld&#8221; is kind of like&#8230;. useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
