<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bye Bye AT&amp;T, 32GB iPhone May Be On The Way, Home Activation An Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:38:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: laura scully</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>laura scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>If they made a 32gb ipod i wouldnt buy it. for be to have an iphone it would cost like 100 bucks a month. Screw that ! i can get a 32Gb ipod touch for 0 dollars a month and keep my cell phone for 40 dollars a month. i wish they would bring the price down it would be ver convenient to have them both in one. why do people argue on these coments... get over youselves its all about saying your opinion... not pussing down all the other peoples lovely comments. anywho i think ill stick with seperate ipods and cell phones its wayyyy cheaper. 
Loves ya... text meh... byebye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they made a 32gb ipod i wouldnt buy it. for be to have an iphone it would cost like 100 bucks a month. Screw that ! i can get a 32Gb ipod touch for 0 dollars a month and keep my cell phone for 40 dollars a month. i wish they would bring the price down it would be ver convenient to have them both in one. why do people argue on these coments&#8230; get over youselves its all about saying your opinion&#8230; not pussing down all the other peoples lovely comments. anywho i think ill stick with seperate ipods and cell phones its wayyyy cheaper.<br />
Loves ya&#8230; text meh&#8230; byebye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: che</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-3354</link>
		<dc:creator>che</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-3354</guid>
		<description>Fast!
But economic price.
PLEASE, make a iPhone 3G with a lot of space like 32GB or even 50GB or 80GB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast!<br />
But economic price.<br />
PLEASE, make a iPhone 3G with a lot of space like 32GB or even 50GB or 80GB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 32GB iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>32GB iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>Required-32GB iPhone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Required-32GB iPhone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-3309</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-3309</guid>
		<description>I think that even if the exclusivity deal with AT&amp;T runs out, people will still stick with AT&amp;T. Back when AT&amp;T was still Cingular, Apple worked with them to tailor their network, as mentioned, to work with the iPhone&#039;s features, from its 3G internet (the usage of which has skyrocketed, to say the least, since the iPhone&#039;s debut) and functional, computer-like browsing to visual voicemail. Switching to another network, at least at this point in time, will most likely mean losing some pretty identifying features, or at least having to use dumbed-down versions of them, meaning that you might as well go for that BlackBerry Storm and an iPod touch. Even if Apple does end up splitting ties with AT&amp;T sometime in the future, though it will obviously be a loss for AT&amp;T, I don&#039;t really believe it&#039;ll be as detrimental as you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that even if the exclusivity deal with AT&amp;T runs out, people will still stick with AT&amp;T. Back when AT&amp;T was still Cingular, Apple worked with them to tailor their network, as mentioned, to work with the iPhone&#8217;s features, from its 3G internet (the usage of which has skyrocketed, to say the least, since the iPhone&#8217;s debut) and functional, computer-like browsing to visual voicemail. Switching to another network, at least at this point in time, will most likely mean losing some pretty identifying features, or at least having to use dumbed-down versions of them, meaning that you might as well go for that BlackBerry Storm and an iPod touch. Even if Apple does end up splitting ties with AT&amp;T sometime in the future, though it will obviously be a loss for AT&amp;T, I don&#8217;t really believe it&#8217;ll be as detrimental as you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohamed el baroudi</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>mohamed el baroudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-3308</guid>
		<description>v gooood but how much price?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>v gooood but how much price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator>vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-3238</guid>
		<description>Verizon makes a bundle with their vcast proprietary software, especially with the storm out. 
But Verizon also owns Vodaphone whih is the largest wireless company in all of the rest of the world. 
Verizon has phones that are both cdma and gsm for overseas coverage--they have already started the 4g network too... but i doubt that they will pick up the iphone. Being that they just aquired Alltel they have got more customers than they even know how to deal with at this point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon makes a bundle with their vcast proprietary software, especially with the storm out.<br />
But Verizon also owns Vodaphone whih is the largest wireless company in all of the rest of the world.<br />
Verizon has phones that are both cdma and gsm for overseas coverage&#8211;they have already started the 4g network too&#8230; but i doubt that they will pick up the iphone. Being that they just aquired Alltel they have got more customers than they even know how to deal with at this point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>3G systems
Although most major 3G systems are primarily based upon CDMA, Time Division Duplexing (TDD), packet scheduling (dynamic TDMA) and packet oriented multiple access schemes are available in 3G form, combined with CDMA to take advantage of the benefits of both technologies.

While the most popular form of the UMTS 3G GSM system uses CDMA instead of TDMA, TDMA is combined with CDMA and Time Division Duplexing in two standard UMTS UTRA modes, UTRA TDD-HCR (better known as TD-CDMA), and UTRA TDD-LCR (better known as TD-SCDMA). In each mode, more than one handset may share a single time slot. UTRA TDD-HCR is used most commonly by UMTS-TDD to provide Internet access, whereas UTRA TDD-LCR provides some interoperability with the forthcoming Chinese 3G standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3G systems<br />
Although most major 3G systems are primarily based upon CDMA, Time Division Duplexing (TDD), packet scheduling (dynamic TDMA) and packet oriented multiple access schemes are available in 3G form, combined with CDMA to take advantage of the benefits of both technologies.</p>
<p>While the most popular form of the UMTS 3G GSM system uses CDMA instead of TDMA, TDMA is combined with CDMA and Time Division Duplexing in two standard UMTS UTRA modes, UTRA TDD-HCR (better known as TD-CDMA), and UTRA TDD-LCR (better known as TD-SCDMA). In each mode, more than one handset may share a single time slot. UTRA TDD-HCR is used most commonly by UMTS-TDD to provide Internet access, whereas UTRA TDD-LCR provides some interoperability with the forthcoming Chinese 3G standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>Haha, don&#039;t flame someone unless you actually know what you&#039;re talking about. n00b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, don&#8217;t flame someone unless you actually know what you&#8217;re talking about. n00b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>Charles.... GSM uses TDMA technology.... check it out on Wikipedia.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_division_multiple_access</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles&#8230;. GSM uses TDMA technology&#8230;. check it out on Wikipedia.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_division_multiple_access" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_division_multiple_access?referer=');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_division_multiple_access</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/09/20/bye-bye-att-32gb-iphone-may-be-on-the-way-home-activation-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=748#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>Chris,

This may be dumbest, most ill informed post I have ever read.  AT&amp;T uses GSM (not TDMA) which is the same base network that is currently in use in Europe.  You fail at technology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>This may be dumbest, most ill informed post I have ever read.  AT&amp;T uses GSM (not TDMA) which is the same base network that is currently in use in Europe.  You fail at technology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
