<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple set to release iSight HD? Avoiding new Cinema Displays at all cost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/15/apple-set-to-release-isight-hd-avoids-new-cinema-displays-at-all-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/15/apple-set-to-release-isight-hd-avoids-new-cinema-displays-at-all-cost/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:31:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: commandersprocket</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/15/apple-set-to-release-isight-hd-avoids-new-cinema-displays-at-all-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>commandersprocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=171#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Ok, I think you&#039;re partially right.  I think you&#039;re missing the integration of touchscreen integration into those displays.  Imagine a light, wireless, touchscreen 17&quot; display that embeds some of the functionality of the ipod touch, has a camera on the front and the back, so you can show what you&#039;re looking at, as well as what you look like.  It doesn&#039;t have a CPU or storage or much else on it so the main battery drain is the leds for the display, so it lasts for 5-8 hours and uses &quot;standard&quot; ibook batteries.   Add to this a pressure sensitive pen and you have a cintiq/wacom killer (they&#039;ve been overpriced for so long it&#039;s a wonder no one has come along and toppled them).  So, now you have a system in the home or office, where, if you have your computer on the wireless (probably will require 802.11N) you&#039;ll be able to get XGA or SXGA (maybe WXGA) displays in a given area.
On the other hand, they might just be making monitors with the camera embedded into the display http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn9059</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I think you&#8217;re partially right.  I think you&#8217;re missing the integration of touchscreen integration into those displays.  Imagine a light, wireless, touchscreen 17&#8243; display that embeds some of the functionality of the ipod touch, has a camera on the front and the back, so you can show what you&#8217;re looking at, as well as what you look like.  It doesn&#8217;t have a CPU or storage or much else on it so the main battery drain is the leds for the display, so it lasts for 5-8 hours and uses &#8220;standard&#8221; ibook batteries.   Add to this a pressure sensitive pen and you have a cintiq/wacom killer (they&#8217;ve been overpriced for so long it&#8217;s a wonder no one has come along and toppled them).  So, now you have a system in the home or office, where, if you have your computer on the wireless (probably will require 802.11N) you&#8217;ll be able to get XGA or SXGA (maybe WXGA) displays in a given area.<br />
On the other hand, they might just be making monitors with the camera embedded into the display <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn9059" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn9059&amp;referer=');">http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn9059</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/15/apple-set-to-release-isight-hd-avoids-new-cinema-displays-at-all-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=171#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Check this out. I think they&#039;re with ya on this one.

http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/11/hey-applewhere-the-fck-are-the-new-cinema-displays-and-macbook-pro-cases/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out. I think they&#8217;re with ya on this one.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/11/hey-applewhere-the-fck-are-the-new-cinema-displays-and-macbook-pro-cases/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/11/hey-applewhere-the-fck-are-the-new-cinema-displays-and-macbook-pro-cases/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/15/apple-set-to-release-isight-hd-avoids-new-cinema-displays-at-all-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=171#comment-302</guid>
		<description>I really hope Apple updates the Cinema Displays soon i&#039;m tired of waiting, I want a 30-inch but been putting it off but know that I have a Mac Pro and using a 17-inch temporary until Apple updates them when ever that may be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope Apple updates the Cinema Displays soon i&#8217;m tired of waiting, I want a 30-inch but been putting it off but know that I have a Mac Pro and using a 17-inch temporary until Apple updates them when ever that may be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
