<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Snow Leopard&#8221; chosen as big-cat for Mac OS X 10.6. Lion lovers have to wait.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/04/snow-leopard-chosen-as-big-cat-for-mac-os-x-106-lion-lovers-have-to-wait/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/04/snow-leopard-chosen-as-big-cat-for-mac-os-x-106-lion-lovers-have-to-wait/</link>
	<description>Bridging the Apple Community and Keeping Tabs on the Rumor Mill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:00:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shishfortwo</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/04/snow-leopard-chosen-as-big-cat-for-mac-os-x-106-lion-lovers-have-to-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Shishfortwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=117#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Apple doesn&#039;t need to remove anything from Leopard. Nor do they need to make MAJOR, MAJOR changes like everyone is stating to Leopard.

Operating Systems are not a little piece of software, they are the frameworks in which we rely on. Upgrades need to be done in a smooth, slow gradual process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple doesn&#8217;t need to remove anything from Leopard. Nor do they need to make MAJOR, MAJOR changes like everyone is stating to Leopard.</p>
<p>Operating Systems are not a little piece of software, they are the frameworks in which we rely on. Upgrades need to be done in a smooth, slow gradual process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/04/snow-leopard-chosen-as-big-cat-for-mac-os-x-106-lion-lovers-have-to-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=117#comment-171</guid>
		<description>And to follow up on the Carbon VS Cocoa stuff, Apple has ALREADY stated that they are not significantly adding new things to the Carbon UI layer.  This was back when they announced there would be 64-bit libraries for the Cocoa UI layer, but not for the Carbon UI layer.  And it would be huge pill to swallow considering the API hasn&#039;t even be deprecated [as in, marked as possibly being removed in a future version of the OS].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to follow up on the Carbon VS Cocoa stuff, Apple has ALREADY stated that they are not significantly adding new things to the Carbon UI layer.  This was back when they announced there would be 64-bit libraries for the Cocoa UI layer, but not for the Carbon UI layer.  And it would be huge pill to swallow considering the API hasn&#8217;t even be deprecated [as in, marked as possibly being removed in a future version of the OS].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/04/snow-leopard-chosen-as-big-cat-for-mac-os-x-106-lion-lovers-have-to-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=117#comment-170</guid>
		<description>A january release seems premature, given 10.5 was only release last fall and SJ said at WWDC they wanted to have slightly longer dev cycles [2 years or so, instead of 1.5 years between releases]. As for the other rumors that it&#039;ll drop PPC support, I would say that has a reasonable probability of being true [particularly if the release is later in 2009], but for dropping Carbon support, I would say that&#039;s very unlikely, given that Adobe CS and Microsoft Office both use Carbon for their UI layer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A january release seems premature, given 10.5 was only release last fall and SJ said at WWDC they wanted to have slightly longer dev cycles [2 years or so, instead of 1.5 years between releases]. As for the other rumors that it&#8217;ll drop PPC support, I would say that has a reasonable probability of being true [particularly if the release is later in 2009], but for dropping Carbon support, I would say that&#8217;s very unlikely, given that Adobe CS and Microsoft Office both use Carbon for their UI layer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.macblogz.com/2008/06/04/snow-leopard-chosen-as-big-cat-for-mac-os-x-106-lion-lovers-have-to-wait/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macblogz.com/?p=117#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Snow Leopard....?  Come on now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snow Leopard&#8230;.?  Come on now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
